WHAT WE DO · AI VERIFICATION & TRUST LAYER

Every agent output, checked
before your team relies on it

Two layers sit under every Wissda agent. One checks that each answer is true to its evidence. The other makes sure every action is approved, permitted and recorded.

Book a demo
The risk nobody talks about

A confident wrong answer costs more than no answer

In regulated work, an AI that sounds right but isn't can end up in a board report, a regulatory filing or an audit file. And some failures are quieter: a system reports that an update saved when the field is actually empty.

We learned this the hard way while building our own GRC agents. So we built the checks first, and every agent runs inside them.

Made-up answers
Conclusions with no evidence behind them.
Silent failures
Updates that report success but never saved.
Drift
Results that were right last month and quietly changed.
Black boxes
Decisions nobody can explain to an auditor.
Two layers

Verification checks the answer. Trust governs the action

AI VERIFICATION LAYER
Is the answer right?
Grounded in evidence
Every output traces back to records the agent actually retrieved.
Independent second review
A separate pass tries to find fault with each draft and can change it.
Continuous evaluation
The AI Evaluation Agent tests accuracy against expert benchmarks.
Honest about uncertainty
When the agent can't decide, it says so clearly instead of guessing.
GRC TRUST LAYER
Is the action allowed and recorded?
Human approval
Your team triggers runs and approves material decisions.
Least-privilege access
Each decision can reach only the data it needs.
Verified write-back
Every update is read back to confirm it saved.
Full audit trail
What was checked, decided and written, step by step.
Inside one decision

Follow a single control rating from start to finish

This is what happens every time a Control Assessment Agent rates one control.

  1. 1
    Checks for a previous answer
    If the evidence hasn't changed since the last reviewed rating, it keeps that rating instead of deciding again.
  2. 2
    Gathers the evidence
    Pulls the control's details, test results, open issues and prior assessment.
  3. 3
    Drafts a rating
    Chooses from your own rating scale and explains why.
  4. 4
    Reviews itself
    A second, independent pass looks for faults and can change the rating.
  5. 5
    Writes and confirms
    Saves to your platform, reads it back, and flags any failure loudly.
  6. 6
    Keeps watching
    Scheduled integrity scans check that the rating is still there days later.
Explainability

One decision, explained two ways

Reviewers and auditors need different depths of detail. Every decision comes with both, stored right next to the record.

FOR THE REVIEWER
A plain-language summary
Sample: "Rated Effective. Latest quarterly test passed; no open issues…"
FOR THE AUDITOR
A technical trail
Sample: evidence table + ordered list of tools the agent called
AI Evaluation Agent
Accuracy you can measure, not just trust

The AI Evaluation Agent independently tests agent outputs for accuracy, consistency and reproducibility, using expert-curated datasets and defined benchmarks. It runs continuously, and its findings guide targeted improvements and fine-tuning.

AccuracyConsistencyReproducibility
Benchmark scorecard over time
SEE IT IN ACTIONNine GRC agents running inside these layersFinancial Services agents → RELATEDGoverning all your AI, not just oursAgentic Workflows & Governance →

See the trail behind every answer

Book a demo